<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Antiantisocial Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nerdlife.net/antiantisocial-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nerdlife.net/antiantisocial-networks/</link>
	<description>*Insert Witty Subtitle Here*</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Maurer</title>
		<link>http://nerdlife.net/antiantisocial-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdlife.net/?p=133#comment-873</guid>
		<description>This paper shows how low the bar is for &quot;research&quot; and Slashdot these days. What the authors don&#039;t mention is that the website can easily use referrer blocking to prevent themselves from wasting outbound bandwidth. This method can&#039;t generate that many requests per second -- 10k/sec at the highest. A single web server can parse requests &amp; filter on referrer at that rate.

The real irony is, the authors have found a better method of DoS than the one listed in their paper. Write a crappy yet sensational paper and try to generate press. Then place a malicious iframe on that site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This paper shows how low the bar is for &#8220;research&#8221; and Slashdot these days. What the authors don&#8217;t mention is that the website can easily use referrer blocking to prevent themselves from wasting outbound bandwidth. This method can&#8217;t generate that many requests per second &#8212; 10k/sec at the highest. A single web server can parse requests &amp; filter on referrer at that rate.</p>
<p>The real irony is, the authors have found a better method of DoS than the one listed in their paper. Write a crappy yet sensational paper and try to generate press. Then place a malicious iframe on that site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

